Disgraced singer, R. Kelly has filed two motions in Chicago’s federal court, seeking a new trial or an outright reversal of his conviction two months ago on child pornography and other sex-abuse related charges.
Jennifer Bonjean, Kelly’s attorney, filed the motions this week with arguments that will likely be heard at an appeal to the 7th Circuit US Court of Appeals, according to the Chicago Tribune.
U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber has set sentencing for Feb. 23.
Bonjean has asked for an acquittal on all counts based on several technical factors.
According to her, the prosecution has not been able to prove that the infamous videotape of Kelly abusing his goddaughter who went by the pseudonym ‘Jane’ was made for the purpose of child pornography.
Bonjean went on to argue that prosecutors also failed to prove that Kelly had ‘coerced’ underage victims to engage in sex acts.
The second motion has asked for a new trial based on alleged misstatements by the government’s first witness at trial Dr. Darrel Turner.
Turner testified during the trial as an expert on how sexual predators ‘groom’ underage victims and told the jury that he billed prosecutors $250 per hour for his work on this case when the actual figure was $450.
The misstatements were allegedly known to the prosecutors who failed to correct them for the jury, she continued.
‘Had the jurors known that Turner actively misled them, the jurors would likely have rejected his testimony outright,’ Bonjean said.
Prosecutors are expected to file responses to Bonjean’s allegations later this month.
The charges Kelly was convicted of carry a minimum of 10 years in prison.
The conviction on those counts comes 14 years after Kelly’s infamous acquittal on similar charges in Cook County, which were based on a single video of Kelly allegedly abusing Jane in the hot tub room of his former home on West George Street. Jane had refused to cooperate in that case.
Kelly was also found guilty on three out of five counts related to the enticement of a minor involving Jane and two other victims who came forward to testify against him.
The jury did however acquit Kelly and two co-defendants on charges to conspire to retrieve incriminating tapes and rig the 2008 trial by pressuring Jane to lie to investigators about their relationship and refuse to testify against him.